2024 |
Babnik, Žiga; Peer, Peter; Štruc, Vitomir eDifFIQA: Towards Efficient Face Image Quality Assessment based on Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models Journal Article In: IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science (TBIOM), pp. 1-16, 2024, ISSN: 2637-6407. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: biometrics, CNN, deep learning, DifFIQA, difussion, face, face image quality assesment, face recognition, FIQA @article{BabnikTBIOM2024,State-of-the-art Face Recognition (FR) models perform well in constrained scenarios, but frequently fail in difficult real-world scenarios, when no quality guarantees can be made for face samples. For this reason, Face Image Quality Assessment (FIQA) techniques are often used by FR systems, to provide quality estimates of captured face samples. The quality estimate provided by FIQA techniques can be used by the FR system to reject samples of low-quality, in turn improving the performance of the system and reducing the number of critical false-match errors. However, despite steady improvements, ensuring a good trade-off between the performance and computational complexity of FIQA methods across diverse face samples remains challenging. In this paper, we present DifFIQA, a powerful unsupervised approach for quality assessment based on the popular denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) and the extended (eDifFIQA) approach. The main idea of the base DifFIQA approach is to utilize the forward and backward processes of DDPMs to perturb facial images and quantify the impact of these perturbations on the corresponding image embeddings for quality prediction. Because of the iterative nature of DDPMs the base DifFIQA approach is extremely computationally expensive. Using eDifFIQA we are able to improve on both the performance and computational complexity of the base DifFIQA approach, by employing label optimized knowledge distillation. In this process, quality information inferred by DifFIQA is distilled into a quality-regression model. During the distillation process, we use an additional source of quality information hidden in the relative position of the embedding to further improve the predictive capabilities of the underlying regression model. By choosing different feature extraction backbone models as the basis for the quality-regression eDifFIQA model, we are able to control the trade-off between the predictive capabilities and computational complexity of the final model. We evaluate three eDifFIQA variants of varying sizes in comprehensive experiments on 7 diverse datasets containing static-images and a separate video-based dataset, with 4 target CNN-based FR models and 2 target Transformer-based FR models and against 10 state-of-the-art FIQA techniques, as well as against the initial DifFIQA baseline and a simple regression-based predictor DifFIQA(R), distilled from DifFIQA without any additional optimization. The results show that the proposed label optimized knowledge distillation improves on the performance and computationally complexity of the base DifFIQA approach, and is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance in several distinct experimental scenarios. Furthermore, we also show that the distilled model can be used directly for face recognition and leads to highly competitive results. |
2023 |
Babnik, Žiga; Peer, Peter; Štruc, Vitomir DifFIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment Using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models Proceedings Article In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics , pp. 1-10, IEEE, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2023. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: biometrics, deep learning, denoising diffusion probabilistic models, diffusion, face, face image quality assesment, face recognition, FIQA, quality @inproceedings{Diffiqa_2023,Modern face recognition (FR) models excel in constrained scenarios, but often suffer from decreased performance when deployed in unconstrained (real-world) environments due to uncertainties surrounding the quality of the captured facial data. Face image quality assessment (FIQA) techniques aim to mitigate these performance degradations by providing FR models with sample-quality predictions that can be used to reject low-quality samples and reduce false match errors. However, despite steady improvements, ensuring reliable quality estimates across facial images with diverse characteristics remains challenging. In this paper, we present a powerful new FIQA approach, named DifFIQA, which relies on denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPM) and ensures highly competitive results. The main idea behind the approach is to utilize the forward and backward processes of DDPMs to perturb facial images and quantify the impact of these perturbations on the corresponding image embeddings for quality prediction. Because the diffusion-based perturbations are computationally expensive, we also distill the knowledge encoded in DifFIQA into a regression-based quality predictor, called DifFIQA(R), that balances performance and execution time. We evaluate both models in comprehensive experiments on 7 diverse datasets, with 4 target FR models and against 10 state-of-the-art FIQA techniques with highly encouraging results. The source code is available from: https://github.com/LSIbabnikz/DifFIQA. |
2022 |
Babnik, Žiga; Peer, Peter; Štruc, Vitomir FaceQAN: Face Image Quality Assessment Through Adversarial Noise Exploration Proceedings Article In: IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2022. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adversarial examples, adversarial noise, biometrics, face image quality assessment, face recognition, FIQA, image quality assessment @inproceedings{ICPR2022,Recent state-of-the-art face recognition (FR) approaches have achieved impressive performance, yet unconstrained face recognition still represents an open problem. Face image quality assessment (FIQA) approaches aim to estimate the quality of the input samples that can help provide information on the confidence of the recognition decision and eventually lead to improved results in challenging scenarios. While much progress has been made in face image quality assessment in recent years, computing reliable quality scores for diverse facial images and FR models remains challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to face image quality assessment, called FaceQAN, that is based on adversarial examples and relies on the analysis of adversarial noise which can be calculated with any FR model learned by using some form of gradient descent. As such, the proposed approach is the first to link image quality to adversarial attacks. Comprehensive (cross-model as well as model-specific) experiments are conducted with four benchmark datasets, i.e., LFW, CFP–FP, XQLFW and IJB–C, four FR models, i.e., CosFace, ArcFace, CurricularFace and ElasticFace and in comparison to seven state-of-the-art FIQA methods to demonstrate the performance of FaceQAN. Experimental results show that FaceQAN achieves competitive results, while exhibiting several desirable characteristics. The source code for FaceQAN will be made publicly available. |
Babnik, Žiga; Štruc, Vitomir Assessing Bias in Face Image Quality Assessment Proceedings Article In: EUSIPCO 2022, 2022. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: bias, bias analysis, biometrics, face image quality assessment, face recognition, FIQA, image quality assessment @inproceedings{EUSIPCO_2022,Face image quality assessment (FIQA) attempts to improve face recognition (FR) performance by providing additional information about sample quality. Because FIQA methods attempt to estimate the utility of a sample for face recognition, it is reasonable to assume that these methods are heavily influenced by the underlying face recognition system. Although modern face recognition systems are known to perform well, several studies have found that such systems often exhibit problems with demographic bias. It is therefore likely that such problems are also present with FIQA techniques. To investigate the demographic biases associated with FIQA approaches, this paper presents a comprehensive study involving a variety of quality assessment methods (general-purpose image quality assessment, supervised face quality assessment, and unsupervised face quality assessment methods) and three diverse state-of-the-art FR models. Our analysis on the Balanced Faces in the Wild (BFW) dataset shows that all techniques considered are affected more by variations in race than sex. While the general-purpose image quality assessment methods appear to be less biased with respect to the two demographic factors considered, the supervised and unsupervised face image quality assessment methods both show strong bias with a tendency to favor white individuals (of either sex). In addition, we found that methods that are less racially biased perform worse overall. This suggests that the observed bias in FIQA methods is to a significant extent related to the underlying face recognition system. |